Quality of life of women undergoing breast cancer treatment: a transversal study
Abstract
Introduction: Mastectomy can promote physical and emotional consequences with repercussions of the woman´s quality of life. It is believed that quantitative measures of quality of life can guide therapeutic intervention strategies and assist in the definition of actions that prioritize health promotion. Objective: To evaluate the quality of life of women undergoing breast cancer treatment. Material and methods: Cross-sectional study, in which a convenience sample of 30 women participated. A questionnaire was applied for sociodemographic and clinical characterization of the sample; and the “Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)” to assess general quality of life. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics; the t-Student test was used to compare two variables; and the ANOVA test to compare more than two variables. The significance level adopted was p <0.05. Results: The SF-36 domains with lowest scores, indicating more damage to health conditions, were “emotional aspects” (5.1) and “physical aspects” (6.5); The domains with the highest scores were “functional capacity” (25.0) and “mental health” (22.3). When comparing preoperative breast cancer treatments with quality of life, the SF-36 “vitality” domain showed a statistically significant difference for radiotherapy (p=0.04). The most prevalent breast surgery was Halsted radical mastectomy, corresponding to 43.3% (n=13) of the sample. Regarding the laterality of the operated breast, 43.3% (n=13) of the participants underwent surgery on the non-dominant side; and 70% (n=21) performed lymphadenectomy, and 16.7% (n=5) reported lymphedema. There was a predominance of sensitivity changes (80%; n=24) postoperatively; and 46.7% (n=14) underwent breast reconstruction. In the evaluation of the practice of sexual activity, 63.3% (n=19) of the women reported not having an active sex life. Conclusion: The quality of life assessed by the SF-36 questionnaire presented the domains “emotional aspect” and “physical aspects” most impaired.
Authors concede the right of its first publication to the Interdisciplinary Journal of Health Sciences and Education, according to the editorial policy of the journal. Reproductions of texts in other publications may be formally requested to the editorial committee via email.